Ride Boldly!

Bikes, bicycling, and road safety.

March 16, 2012
by julie
1 Comment

Kids & Balance Bikes

Balance Bikes

From Flickr, via Creative Commons

As adult cyclists, we get involved in many debates. Carbon or steel? Campy or SRAM or Shimano? Spandex or civilian wear? Helmet or no helmet?

Turns out that there’s a special debate for “cycling parents:” Balance bike or training wheels?

This debate took me a little by surprise, because until I spawned I was mostly unaware of it.

Turns out the new hotness for teaching kids to ride is the balance bike. It’s like a bike, only no pedals. Kid is supposed to be able to sit on the seat and go flat-footed to ground from it. Child can scoot with feet down, push off, and learn balance. The argument is that it allows kids to focus on balance, counter-balance steering, and control without having to worry about what can be a fairly advanced motion: Pedaling.

Meanwhile, the training wheel crowd is sometimes criticized because training wheels allow kids to screw around with the handlebars with fewer consequences, and doesn’t force kids to learn balance. They can contribute to some habits that later must be unlearned. On the other hand, most kids do all right pretty quick on training wheels and feel capable quickly.

Of course, these are purist controversies. There is no way in heck I could have made my son buy into a balance bike. They have no pedals. When he was younger, he liked to just roll the pedals on my mountain bike. He’d have instantly announced that the bike had no pedals. Game over.

There are other issues with balance bikes, in my view. One, many of them are pricey. They’re made of wood and bamboo and all sorts of eco-tastic stuff. While there are cheaper available, they have limited utility once the kid gets stuff figured out. So then you’re on the hook for the bike with a chain and pedals. And if you kid rejects the balance bike, like mine would? Whoops.

As a result, I’ve kind of embraced Sheldon Brown’s delightful middle ground: Buy a kid’s bike. REMOVE THE PEDALS if you’re into the balance bike mythology. Pow. You have an instant balance bike that converts back to a “real” bike with a few twists. And if your kid rejects the balance bike? POW. Install training wheels. Total win-win. So everyone needs to stop making this an outpost in the cyclewars and just put their kids on bikes. Now.

February 23, 2012
by julie
Comments Off on Public Meetings for MnDOT Bicycle Statewide Planning Study Scheduled

Public Meetings for MnDOT Bicycle Statewide Planning Study Scheduled

MnDOTMinnesota’s Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is launching a new statewide planning study intended to inventory existing bicycle facilities throughout the state, including those created by local government groups, and develop statewide policy guidelines surrounding bicycle planning. A new Statewide Bikeway Map will also be produced.

And they want our help.

MnDOT has scheduled a series of workshops to take place throughout Minnesota over the next several weeks. Meetings are scheduled as follows:

  • Mankato: Tuesday, February 28
  • Twin Cities: Wednesday, February 29
  • Rochester: Tuesday, March 6
  • Willmar: Monday, March 12
  • Detroit Lakes: Tuesday, March 13
  • St. Cloud: Wednesday, March 14
  • Duluth: Thursday, March 15
  • Bemidji: Thursday, March 1
  • Online/Virtual: March 22 (11:30 AM session)

Each session is from 4-6PM. More information on each session is online at http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bike/study.html, including exact locations of each session.

February 23, 2012
by julie
4 Comments

Meta: New Bike!

So, I finally went out and did it. I got me a new bike.

For those paying attention, I had a child in 2008, and celebrated that happy occasion by building a custom Orbea:

Julie's Orbea

It is a bike of surpassing loveliness and happiness. It is also 100% unsuited to the hauling of child trailers, trail-a-bikes, or anything else in which it is legal to drag a kid around.

Thus, in 2010, when I had a second child, something was going to have to happen. My old road bike wasn’t suited to trailer hauling, and my old MTB works okay over distances not to exceed about 20 miles unless I want my back to require medical intervention to move later.

Thus, I have now procured this fine beastie. I’ve been making initial modifications to it already since this image, as it required bottle cages, a way to carry tools/tire supplies, and, of course, the trailer skewer:

Surly Cross-Check

This bike in some respects is completely unlike the Orbea. Where the Orbea is European, carbon, and fast, this baby is steel. It’s got wider, more solid tires. It is designed to take a beating. It can go plenty fast, especially if not attached to a 50-pound trailer, but it can also support fully-loaded touring.

I’m excited about having the new bike. When I can abandon my kids (with a trusted sitter, duh), I can frolic on my Orbea. When we want to go to a soccer match or bike racing at the NSC, or find ice cream, or go look at trains (my older child loves watching trains go by), the Surly will allow me to hitch a child behind and go. We now have two bikes that can haul a child, so everyone in the family can bike together. Yay.

February 22, 2012
by julie
Comments Off on New at streets.mn: Safe Routes to Schools Messaging

New at streets.mn: Safe Routes to Schools Messaging

I’m happy to announce that I’ve become an occasional contributor to StreetsMN, a blog devoted to discussing transportation infrastructure and planning throughout our fair state. My first contribution, Safe Routes to Schools: Getting the Message Right, talks about the challenge faced by Safe Routes in going beyond marketing the program as a health program and making it meaningful for a broad constituency of neighbors.

Everyone should read StreetsMN anyway, because it’s a really interesting and diverse group of contributors with different world views, training, and perspectives.

So, go.

February 13, 2012
by julie
5 Comments

Not In My Front Yard: Safe Routes Stalls in Blaine Council

Nothing quite like suburbia to make you want to grind your teeth.

In September 2011, MNDOT awarded several Safe Routes to Schools grants to Anoka County suburbs to help encourage kids to walk to school. One of the projects was to improve walkability to Westwood Intermediate and Middle Schools by constructing a six-foot sidewalk on 91st Avenue NE in front of the schools and to add an extension on Jackson Street NE south to the 89th Avenue city trail.

Sounds super, right? Especially since SRTS projects are funded at 100% with no match required from local government. Hooray!

No, of course not. The Blaine City Council is officially deadlocked about actually building the sidewalk. One council member objects to how much a sidewalk will “cut into” homeowner lots, especially narrow ones. However, there’s one filthy problem with acting like this cuts into homeowner property: It doesn’t. Those homes, much like my own Blaine-area residence, includes city right of way. Something like the first 10 feet of my property is technically city right of way. 91st Avenue NE being a part of “Old Blaine,” my money’s on the same being true for these homeowners. That lawn they mow? Ain’t theirs, really.

Another council member believes that building the sidewalk won’t prevent students from cutting through the church parking lot. Well, of course it won’t. I doubt that was the stated purpose of the project. Kids cut through church parking lots.

Of 258 property owners who would be impacted by the project, 50 attended the public meeting. Blaine council workshops do not allow public input, just observation.

I’m seeing more and more of these situations — someone with authority to do so applies for a grant, then when it gets funded, stuff goes higgledy piggledy when government bodies get involved. Fridley’s grant from Bike Walk Twin Cities comes to mind.

The sidewalk project is really important, especially in light of the growing pains of School District 16 — the district’s K-3 schools are at (or beyond) capacity, and those very schools feed into Westwood Intermediate. More kids in K-3 equates to more kids coming to 4-6 very soon. Let’s give them sidewalks to help them get there.

(Note: I am about 6 years from having a kid at Westwood. Having this sidewalk would make it possible for said child to bike to school. So, yes, I have a bias here in favor of the sidewalk.)